Killing Reagan the Violent Assault That Changed a Presidency Book Review
 | |
| Writer | Pecker O'Reilly and Martin Dugard |
|---|---|
| State | United States |
| Linguistic communication | English |
| Field of study | Attempted Assassination of Ronald Reagan |
| Publisher | Henry Holt and Co. |
| Publication date | September 22, 2015 |
| Media type | Hardcover |
| Pages | 336 |
| ISBN | 978-1627792417 |
Killing Reagan: The Violent Set on That Inverse a Presidency is a volume written by Bill O'Reilly and Martin Dugard about the attempted assassination of U.Due south. President Ronald Reagan in 1981.[1] [2] It is the fifth in the Killing series, following Killing Lincoln, Killing Kennedy, Killing Jesus, and Killing Patton. The book was released on September 22, 2015,[two] and topped The New York Times All-time Sellers List.[ citation needed ]
Plot [edit]
In 1981, after delivering a speech at the Washington Hilton Hotel on March 30, President Reagan is shot by John Hinckley, Jr. Virtually expiry, Reagan's life is in the balance in the easily of doctors at George Washington University Hospital. At the White Firm however, there is chaos as Reagan's cabinet is led by Secretary of State Alexander Haig.
Adaptation [edit]
On September 26, 2015, about a week after the book'southward release, National Geographic announced that a telly pic accommodation is in the works.[3] In May 2016, it was announced that Tim Matheson and Cynthia Nixon would play Ronald and Nancy Reagan respectively in the upcoming television motion picture.[iv] Filming began in belatedly May.[4] It premiered Sunday, October 16 at viii PM.
Criticism [edit]
Post-obit the release of Killing Reagan, Reagan biographers Craig Shirley, Steven Hayward, Paul Kengor, and Kiron Skinner, along with a handful of quondam Reagan aides, immediately began to challenge the book on its factual inaccuracies and historical fabrications.[5] Those 4 Reagan biographers, who had written 19 biographies on Ronald Reagan amidst them, penned an op-ed for The Washington Postal service on October 16 that highlighted what they claimed to be major historical inaccuracies and outright fabrications used in O'Reilly'south book.[6] Additional criticisms surfaced from officials that served in the Reagan Administration, who were nowadays at the events discussed in the book, yet dispute what actually happened. A. B. Culvahouse, who served equally counsel to the president from 1987 to 1989, calls one of the key anecdotes of O'Reilly's book describing a meeting focused on President Reagan's fitness to concur part "a debunked myth."[vii]
In response, O'Reilly took to the airwaves on October 19, responding to the criticism and calling his critics "zealots and jealous people."[viii] He likewise called the criticisms "comical," to which Reagan historian Shirley responded "Then far, I've written four books on Ronald Reagan, written dozens of articles, given dozens of lectures, am a trustee of Eureka College, taught a form at that place [titled] Reagan 101, and take lectured at the Reagan Library and the Reagan Ranch. [I]t is fair to say we probably know a little bit more about Ronald Reagan than Bill O'Reilly. Nosotros certainly know the facts of Ronald Reagan."[9]
The following twenty-four hour period, Ed Meese, who served as counselor to the president (1981–1985) and Chaser General (1985–1988), penned a joint op-ed with Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation executive director John Heubusch detailed more than inaccuracies in O'Reilly'south book, saying "nosotros believe that Killing Reagan does a existent disservice to our 40th president and to history itself."[10] The same day, Frank Donatelli, President Reagan'south assistant for political and intergovernmental affairs, also penned an op-ed for The Washington Times disputing O'Reilly'south central thesis as another discredited "senility myth" about Ronald Reagan.[11]
More criticisms came from reporters at The Washington Post, who looked into O'Reilly'due south merits to have "double-sourced everything" in his book.[ commendation needed ] On October nineteen, 2015, about a month after the book was published, O'Reilly'south researcher outset reached out to the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library to obtain a document that O'Reilly himself chosen a "fundamental function of the book."[12] On October 21, it was reported that Annelise Anderson, the fact-checker that O'Reilly and Dugard deputed to research and fact-check the manuscript for Killing Reagan, pulled out of the project after realizing that the authors were "distorting" material, in her opinion.[thirteen] In National Review she farther stated, "Why the authors desire to nowadays this distorted 'witch and wimp' view of Nancy [Reagan] and the 40th president is puzzling, especially since an culling view of the upshot of Reagan's near-death experience is so readily bachelor."[14]
George Volition called the volume a work of "nonsensical history and execrable citizenship." He added that it "should come up with a warning: 'Caution—you are about to enter a no-facts zone.'"[15]
References [edit]
- ^ "Bill O'Reilly pens his next book: 'Killing Reagan'". Washington Times . Retrieved 30 May 2015.
- ^ a b "Beak O'Reilly to 'kill' again with his new volume on Reagan". CNN Money . Retrieved thirty May 2015.
- ^ "National Geographic Channel adapting 'Killing Reagan' as a TV Pic". UPI.com. Retrieved September 26, 2015.
- ^ a b "Tim Matheson and Cynthia Nixon bring together Killing Reagan equally Ronald and Nancy". Entertainment Weekly. May half dozen, 2016. Retrieved May vi, 2016.
- ^ "Killing Bill: Reagan aides assail O'Reilly'southward volume, 'Total B.Southward.'". Washington Examiner . Retrieved 2015-10-22 .
- ^ Kengor, Craig Shirley, Kiron K. Skinner, Paul; Hayward, Steven F. (2015-10-16). "What Bill O'Reilly'due south new volume on Ronald Reagan gets incorrect about Ronald Reagan". The Washington Mail service. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2015-10-22 .
- ^ "A. B. Culvahouse: Beak O'Reilly's 'Killing Reagan' revives debunked myth". USA TODAY . Retrieved 2015-10-22 .
- ^ "O'Reilly Fires Back at Killing Reagan Critics: They Don't Want United states of america Telling Truth". www.mediaite.com . Retrieved 2015-ten-22 .
- ^ "Reagan experts to O'Reilly: You don't know what you're talking about". Washington Examiner . Retrieved 2015-x-22 .
- ^ "O'Reilly's "Killing Reagan": Fiction, Posing as Biography | RealClearPolitics". www.realclearpolitics.com . Retrieved 2015-10-22 .
- ^ "FRANK DONATELLI: Some other Ronald Reagan senility myth". The Washington Times . Retrieved 2015-10-22 .
- ^ Wemple, Erik (2015-x-20). "O'Reilly's 'Killing Reagan' co-writer still angling for key 1987 memo". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2015-ten-22 .
- ^ Wemple, Erik (2015-10-21). "Later on reading manuscript, scholar bailed on 'Killing Reagan' project". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2015-10-22 .
- ^ "Killing the Reagan Legacy". www.nationalreview.com. National Review Online. Retrieved 2015-10-22 .
- ^ Stephens, Bret (xx May 2017). "Opinion | Roger Ailes: The Man Who Wrecked Conservatism". The New York Times.
External links [edit]
- Official website
- Buchanan, Bay (Sep 22, 2015). "After Words with Bill O'Reilly" (Video). C-Span. Afterwards Words.
Bill O'Reilly talked about his book Killing Reagan, in which he looks at the career of Ronald Reagan and the challenges the president faced following his assassination attempt.
arreolalonarterfes.blogspot.com
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_Reagan
0 Response to "Killing Reagan the Violent Assault That Changed a Presidency Book Review"
Post a Comment